top of page

Science & Scripture

Intelligent Design: Closing the gap between God and Science

The Universe

INTRODUCTION

It's popular to think that God has no place in science, or the scientific community, but that is not true. Data from a 2009 Pew Research Center survey showed that approximately 33% of scientists believe in God, 18% believe in a universal spirit, or deity, 41% are atheist, and 7% don't know, or refused to answer.  So the majority of scientists do believe in God, or a type of god, which is contradictory to what you hear from the general public. Let's break it down even further into 4 different fields of study: Biological or medical, Chemistry, Geosciences, and Physics & Astronomy. According to the survey:

Biological or Medical: 32% believe in God, 19% believe in a deity, 41% are Atheist, 7% don't know.

Chemistry: 41% believe in God, 14% believe in a deity, 39% are Atheist, 7% don't know.

Geosciences: 30% believe in God, 20% believe in a deity, 47% are Atheist, 3% don't know.

Physics & Astronomy: 29% believe in God, 14% believe in a deity, 46% are Atheist, 11% don't know.

As you can see, there is a pretty even divide in our scientific community. If science was so sure that there is no God, then we should see a lot more atheists than this survey showed. The rise of Intelligent Design is a study that has helped close the gap between science and scripture, but atheists and agnostics argue against intelligent design, saying that God has no place in science. They believe that including a creator in their findings may sway scientists, who believe in God, to corrupt the findings because of their own personal belief, suppressing any findings that may refute his existence (we who believe in God, or a deity, could also argue the same point. That atheists may suppress evidence that may prove a creator, or designer, exists because of their own personal beliefs). It is a weak argument considering Intelligent Design is built around what we can see. This entire universe right down to cell structure, and the subatomic particles that make up an atom, appears to be constructed, or designed. Beyond the atom, into the study of the quantized world, the deterministic view of the world is replaced with the law of probability. Everything appears random, but can be "calculated" using probability and statistics, which mean that it is not entirely random, but just appears that way. Quantum particles are built on a law that is separate from the world that we see. Everything that we observe, even the quantum world, obeys a "law", and is constructed of complex mathematical principles. One example is our very own DNA and RNA. It is literal DATA that encodes us like a complex computer program. One great mystery is a cell's membrane. The cell's membrane needs RNA coding to be made. The RNA can't survive in a cell without a membrane, but the membrane can't be made without RNA coding. This goes beyond the "chicken or the egg" scenario. One just can't exist without the other, which means they had to have been created together. God's fingerprint in this universe is everywhere. It can be seen in the world, and there is evidence in scripture. Studying both can help us to better know this universe, by better knowing the One who created it, God, who is the greatest scientist. Evidence for God's existence is in all of his creation, just as it is written in Romans 1:20.

"For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God."

 

THE UNIVERSE

The Universe is believed to have a beginning that happened approximately 13.8 Billion years ago due to and event called The Big Bang. The big bang is the most widely accepted scientific theory that explains the present state of the observable universe (Wikipedia-Big Bang 2022). According to this theory, in the beginning, the known universe was thousands of times smaller than a pinhead and was condensed into a point with infinite density and high energy intense heat known as a Singularity. In fact, scientists have calculated that within 10-12 seconds after the creation of the universe, the universe’s mass density was 2x1013 kg/m3. Our sun’s core mass density is only 1.5x105 kg/m3 (physicsoftheuniverse.com 2009-2022). That means that the universe, 10-12 seconds after creation, was approximately 133,333,333 times denser than our sun. It was this extreme density that caused particles to form.  The universe then began to expand and cool, forming the lighter elements Hydrogen and Helium. The universe began expanding exponentially and after about 100-250 million years, the first stars began to form its first stars (Larson & Bromm Jan. 19, 2009). It was commonly believed that the universe held uniformity, meaning, it was the same everywhere and was not expanding. Proof of an expanding universe was discovered when Edwin Hubble in 1929 when he observed what is called redshift. Redshift happens when the wavelengths of light are stretched to longer wavelengths, causing the object to appear red. This happens because, on the electromagnetic spectrum, the color red had a longer wavelength than the other visible colors. Some galaxies, such as the Andromeda galaxy, have a blueshift because they appear to be moving closer to us. Most galaxies that astronomers have observed have a redshift. This majority redshift is evidence of an expanding universe. Although it is the most supported theory for the beginning of our universe, the Big Bang theory doesn’t explain where matter or space-time came from, and scientists agree that there is no evidence, or supporting hypothesis, that there was anything before the big bang. In lamest terms, they just don’t know. But one thing we do know, the Big Bang helps support the theory of intelligent design. That there was a creator to the known universe.

Contrary to popular belief, the Bible doesn’t really go into detail about the creation of the universe except that God created it. It doesn’t say where it came from, or how God created it. Most verses in the Bible dealing with creation, such as Genesis chapter 1, talk about the creation of the Earth and not the universe. Scripture says that the Earth was round, that the universe was created out of nothing, and that the universe was created by an intelligent supernatural being by His own understanding. In the book of Enoch (scripture that is not found in the bible most bibles) it even mentions that the Earth "tilted", possibly referring to the tilt of the Earth or the wobble on its axis. Roman's 1:20 says that evidence of God's existence is in all of His creation, and when we look at all of his creation, we see his fingerprint on everything. All things in this universe appear to have been designed. Before we dive into scripture though, let’s look at the universe as a whole, designed by God. If there is a designer, there should be evidence that it is designed. Is there? Does science show that the Universe was designed? Indeed, it does. Even atheistic scientists will admit that everything has the appearance of design, from the beginning of the universe, right down to the function of earth, and all living things. They admit that everything has the appearance of design, but that this “appearance” is an illusion. Their childish claim is projected onto the rest of the scientific community, forcing others to BELIEVE that the universe came into being, and exists, without a designer. Francis Crick, the scientist who co-discovered of the structure of DNA, once wrote: "that biologists must constantly remind themselves that what they see was not designed but evolved.” How stubborn and childish. Let's take a look at some evidence of design in the universe. 

 

Psalms 102:25

25In the beginning you laid the foundations of the earth, and the Heavens are the work of your hands.

Does anything truly happen by accident? Is there such a thing as a coincidence? It seems ridiculous to observe how life coexists, how life supports other life on Earth, and to still assume that it was all an accident.

 

Psalm 136:3-9

3 give thanks to the Lord of Lords: His love endures forever

4 to him who alone does great wonders, His love endures forever

5 who by his understanding made the Heavens, His love endures forever

6 who spread the earth upon the waters, His love endures forever

7 who made the great lights- His love endures forever

8 the sun to govern the day, His love endures forever

9 the moon and the stars to govern the night; His love endures forever

 

Isaiah 40:21-22

21Do you not know? Have you not heard? Has it not been told to you from the beginning? Have you not understood since the earth was founded? 22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the Heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in.

In verse 22 it says, "The circle of the earth", meaning that the Earth is round.

 

Jeremiah 51:15

15“He made the earth by his power, he founded the world by his wisdom and stretched out the heavens by his understanding.

Currently, we don’t understand everything about our universe.  In fact, if you begin studying the sciences, you will find out that we really don't know anything. We are still primitive, and only beginning to understand the universe, and the world around us. If all the knowledge in the universe could fit in a glass, we might know a drop in that glass.

 

John 1:1-3

1In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God. 2He was with God in the beginning. 3Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

Jesus is the first and the last, the Alpha and Omega. He was the first from God (Proverbs 8:22-30), and all was created through him. Many find it hard to believe that God is one, and God is three. The math doesn't add up. The problem is that the word “God” translated from the Greek “Theos” is used loosely throughout the new testament. There is God, the Father, who is above all and is even called the Lord of Jesus (Colossian 1:3). The word “Lord” is translated from the Greek word “kyrios” which means: “to whom a person or thing belongs, about which he has power of deciding: master, lord”. Jesus also refers to himself as “kyrios” over us, but never over God, the Father. The Father is the one true God over all, even Jesus, and Jesus was the first created (Colossians 1:15) and is Lord over us.

 

Romans 4:17

17The God who gives life to the dead and calls things that are not as though they were.

God has called everything into existence out of nothing. Science has theorized that in the beginning was the "BIG BANG" and nothing before that. If you do some research, many scientists are searching for new answers. They believe that there was something before the big bang, and some even completely deny the big bang theory altogether, saying that it was impossible. Many new theories are springing up. Theories need observable experiments to prove them fact. It seems unreachable to experiment with "absolute nothing" and bring something from it. So, theory may always stay theory. Regardless, the Big Bang theory supports scripture, and vice versa.

 

Hebrews 1:1-2

1In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets many times and in various ways. 2but in these last days He has spoken to us by His son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom He made the universe.

John and Paul both talk about how the universe was created through Christ. Jesus was with God before he came to Earth, and he has all the wisdom that the Father has given him. How would God create the Universe through Jesus? Well, this universe doesn’t just exist in space time, it is space time. God, the father, is outside of time, and is not bound by time, which means He supersedes, and exists beyond, space time and the known universe. Just as if you would play a videogame, you are not bound by the dimensions and laws (coding) that make the game run. To create things inside the game (for instance, the popular game minecraft), you need someone who is on the inside.

 

 Hebrews 11:3

3By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible.

All matter is made up of tiny atoms that are invisible to the naked eye. With particle accelerators, such as the large hadron collider, we are only now truly beginning to discover what makes up the universe. In a video game, everything is made up of coding (high level, like c++, and low level, like binary bits), and pixels. It all runs on a very complicated system made up of a CPU, GPU, RAM, a hard drive, power supply, and a motherboard. Though these computer systems, we have been able to create our own universes. Thousands of worlds with non-playable characters that have a low-level artificial intelligence which is getting better as the years go by. How much longer until the AI that we create becomes self-aware, and is granted citizenry in our world, just as we who believe are granted citizenry in the kingdom of Christ? How can people say that this universe could not have been created, when we have already created our own?

Terraforming the Earth

TERRAFORMING THE EARTH

If you examine the Earth, and everything in it, you will see that life supports life. Everything has its own function, even us. But what is our function? According to scripture, God commanded us to populate the world. It was the first command from God to Adam and Eve. It was also the first command to Noah when he left the Ark after the flood. God said, "Be fruitful and multiply." Humans have done a good job of that, so what’s next? The solar system? The galaxies? The Universe? If God created the universe, why did he make it so big and empty? Who is to say that it is empty? Scripture speaks of beings in the heavens, and one day we may fill the heavens ourselves. We are becoming more capable of space travel, with intent to populate the moon and mars in the near future. There may already be beings capable of such things. Elijah was taken up in a “whirlwind”, and Jesus also was “taken up” right in front of his disciples. Scripture says that the Angels "came down" from heaven, which means that those that saw them “come down”, saw them come down out of the sky. The watchers, in the book of Enoch, are also written of as having “come down” from the sky to the Earth. Clearly God created other beings that are capable of flight, space travel, and/or possibly interdimensional travel, if such a thing exists. Accounts of such beings are written about in the Bible, in other scripture, as well as other ancient religious texts. We know that the scribes of history wrote about what they saw, so there is no reason to believe that such beings did not, and do not, possibly exist or have such capabilities. Are there more populated planets? Are there other beings throughout the universe? Was Earth created? Is Earth the only populated planet in the universe?

 

Psalm 89:6

For who in the skies above can compare with the Lord? Who is like the Lord among the heavenly beings?

Maybe Earth is just our start, and God plans to fill the universe with the beings that He “created after His own image”. When talking about Jesus Paul writes in Ephesians 4:14:

 

What does “he ascended” mean except that he also descended to the lower, earthly regions? He who descended is the very one who ascended higher than all the heavens, in order to fill the whole universe.

 

What an odd thing to write. Was Paul saying that Jesus is going to populate the Universe? This is one of the many questions that may not be answered until Jesus comes back. These questions add to the aw of God’s mysteries and the Earth is one of those mysteries. According to science, the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. We are the only known planet that can sustain life. We are the perfect size, our rotation is not too fast or too slow, we are the perfect distance from the sun, our sun is the right size, the orbit, and tilt of the Earth, around the sun is perfect to sustain all four seasons, and the distance and orbit of the moon support our tides which affect the marine ecosystem. Also, we are in the perfect period in Earth’s history to be alive. The early earth was very hostile, according to scientific research. If we were a little closer to the sun, our planet would be scorched, and if we were just a little further from the sun, everything would suffer freezing temperatures. The Magnetic field that the Earth produces keeps harmful radiation from killing everything on the planet. The moon stimulates tidal activity and stabilizes the axis tilt. Everything around, and on earth, works perfectly together to sustain life. If you take one part out, whether it would be the moon, or a species, it suffers as a whole. It’s like building an engine and taking a sensor out. The engine won’t work right. You need it built completely to be in perfect working condition. Earth is also the densest planet in our solar system. It is the only one known to have such life sustaining resources ranging from water, animals, and plants to natural resources such as coal, oil, natural gas, gold, silver etc. Virtually anything we need for building or advancing technologically is already here for us. Is this all coincidence, or did God create our planet for us with abundant resources to survive? 

 

Many people believe God created the earth in six days and that the earth is only six thousand years old. But did you know that it is written in 2 Peter 3:8:

2 Peter 3:8

But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.

As we can see in this verse, a “day/yom” does not always mean a twenty-four hour period with God, so, the “six day” creation doesn’t have to be taken literal. Many argue that the original Hebrew text gives an account that is a literal six day creation. It is possible that Moses told the story in this way so that others could understand it as it relates to a seven day week. For instance, just like when Moses gave hundreds of laws about eating clean and unclean animals. People saw it as law and sin to eat unclean animals, but really these laws were all created for health reasons. The unclean animals were known, and still known, to carry all types of diseases. The people wouldn’t have been able to understand such things as germs, bacteria, and viruses, in those days, so Moses made them a law, or rather, God gave them as a law through Moses, to protect the people. As we can see in Acts 10:15 when Peter was on a roof meditating, he had a vision about a huge sheet with all kinds of clean and unclean animals that were lowered down from heaven. A voice said, “kill and eat”. Peter refused because he said that no unclean animal had ever touched his lips, in which a voice replied saying, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.” So, God gave permission to eat any animal. But I digress. To get back to the point, the Hebrew word used for "day" in Genesis is "yom" and has more than just one meaning. According to the Blue Letter Bible App, the definition of the Hebrew word "yom" can mean:

a. day (as opposed to night)

b. day (24 hour period)

c. days, lifetime.

d. time, period (general).

e. year.

f. temporal references.

So, if we take into consideration that each day may have been a general period, rather than a literal 24-hour period, and each “evening and morning” event were the end of each period and the beginning of the next, then the seven days of creation would be the seven periods of creation (or rather six periods, since the seventh was the day of rest, and we are still in that seventh period). There is also the chance that the seven days may have been a hyperbole used to help understand the story, to coincide with a seven day week that may have already been in existence. It is known that the seven day week has been used at least since about 4000 years ago, in Babylon, and has ties to the seven visible planets (BBC Bitesize, 2022).  A timeline and description of the Genesis account is as follows:

​​

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth.

At this point, all of the Universe is created, as well as the Earth. It gives no timeline for any of it, only that God (Elohim) created them.

 

Genesis 1:2 The earth was formless and empty, and darkness covered the deep waters and the spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters. 

This is before the first creation “day” (yom). At this point, the Earth already existed. If it didn’t, how could the spirit of God be hovering over the waters of a formless and empty Earth. Scripture gives proof that the earth and the rest of the universe was already created well before the creation day accounts begin. The creation day account could more literally be translated to terraforming periods. From this point on, everything that takes place during these “days” are from the perspective of the surface of the earth. It is possible that the period of Genesis 1:2  is taking place about 3 billion years ago, when scientists believe that the entire Earth may have been covered in water, and no life yet existed (Korey Haynes, March 6, 2020).

 

Genesis 1:3-5 Then God (Elohim) said, "Let there be light," and there was light. And God (Elohim) saw that the light was good. Then he separated the light from the darkness. God (Elohim) called the light "day" (yon/12 hours) and the darkness "night". And evening passed and morning came, marking the first day (yon/period).

According to Job 38:9, God said that the earth was covered in clouds, wrapping it in a thick darkness. The verse in Job coincides with the period mentioned in Genesis 1:3-5, where God began to form the atmosphere (exosphere, thermosphere, mesosphere, stratosphere, ozone, and troposphere) from a thicker atmosphere, allowing light to come through to the surface of the earth. This period, by scientists, is marked at the Archean Eon, which occurred between 4 billion and 2.5 billion years ago. This is a time period where scientists believe the Earth had a thick atmosphere of Carbon dioxide that formed from highly active volcanos, which caused a greenhouse effect (Britannica, 2019). Also, during this time period (about 3 billion years ago), the Sun only shone about 70% as bright as it did today. This period fits well within the context of the creation story found in Genesis 1. As we will see throughout the rest of the creation periods, science confirms Genesis 1.

At the end of Genesis 1:5, God then denotes the end of this period, and the beginning of the next, by showing that evening passed (the period ended) and morning came (beginning of the next period).  You can also notice the differences between the use of the word “yom” in this passage. The first use of the word “yom” is to describe the period where God “separated light from darkness” on earth (about 12 hours of daylight) and the second use, God calls the entire first period of creation (terraforming) as a day. This shows that the word “yom” has multiple uses that don’t always consist of a twenty-four hour period. We also have to consider that the modern Hebrew language only consists of about 33,000, and ancient Hebrew consisted of even less. There were only about 7,000 words used in the OT bible (Jerusalem Post, Eyton Halon, February 17, 2018). In English, it is sometimes hard to articulate what we are thinking, even with over 1 million words at our disposal. Imagine only having a handful of words and trying to describe such a thing as the creation of the Earth. This is why the same word is used in many different ways, and may have different meanings in the Hebrew language, and can be misinterpreted easily. 

 

Genesis 1:6-8 Then God said, "Let there be a space between the waters, to separate the waters of the heavens from the waters of the earth." And that is what happened. God made this space to separate the waters of the earth from the waters of the heavens. God called the space "sky". and evening passed and morning came, marking the second day.

Here, God begins the formation of the Troposphere The Troposphere is the lowest part of the atmosphere. It contains about 75-80 percent of the total mass of the atmosphere (UCAR, 2011), and is made up of 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen with the last 1% made up of argon, water vapor, and carbon dioxide. This time period took place between about 2.5 billion years and 500 million years ago. Around 2.7 billion years ago, microscopic organisms called Cyanobacteria began creating oxygen from carbon dioxide, and after about 700 million years, the methane haze cleared and the sky turned blue (The Archean Eon, Forces.si.edu, 2022). This is how God kickstarted the formation of the atmosphere. As more and more Cyanobacteria formed, more oxygen was created, and after about 2 billion years, the atmosphere was ready to support plant life, which coincidently, appeared about 500 million years ago, right around the same time the atmosphere was about finished (Katie Pavid, 2018).

Genesis 1:9-13 Then God said, "Let the waters beneath the sky flow together into one place, so dry ground may appear." And that is what happened. God called the dry ground "land" and the waters "seas." And God saw that it was good. Then God said, "Let the land sprout with vegetation-every sort of seedbearing plant, and trees that grow seedbearing fruit. These seeds will then produce the kinds of plants and trees from which they came. And that is what happened. The land produced vegetation-all sorts of seed-bearing plants, and trees with see-bearing fruit. Their seeds produced plants and trees of the same kind. And God saw that it was good. And evening passed and morning came, marking the third day (yom/period).

As the atmosphere formed, tectonic plate activity helped maintain earth's water cycle (Jun Korenaga, 2017). Evaporating water condensed into clouds in the atmosphere, and land is revealed. This period taked place after the beginning of the formation of the Troposphere and ends about 500 million years ago with the creation of plant life. The Hebrew word translated "let the land sprout" is "qasa" and its definition is as follows:

i. to sprout, shoot, grow green.

ii. to cause to sprout, cause to shoot forth.

This passage shows that God created the water cycle and used the earth to "cause" it to produce plants. He didn't magically say "appear" and they appeared. It was a process that he guided which started about 500 million years ago.

Genesis 1:14-19 Then God said, "Let lights appear in the sky to separate the day from the night. let them be signs to mark the seasons, days, and years. Let these lights in the sky shine down on the earth." And that is what happened. God made two great lights- the larger one to govern the day, and the smaller one to govern the night. He also made the stars. God set these lights in the sky to light the earth, to govern the day and night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. And evening passed and morning came, marking the fourth day (yom/period).

Here, as earth further cools, and the atmosphere grows thinner, the stars, sun, and moon become completely visible. Many believe that this passage speaks about the creation of the stars, moon, and sun, but as we saw in verse one, God had already created the heavens and the earth before he began terraforming it, and on the first creation day, he revealed night and day. How could there be night and day if there was not already a sun. This period would have been around the 500 million years ago, when Earth’s atmosphere would have finally become breathable. The oxygen levels had reached a higher level, and the CO2 gases would have decreased. The overcast from the greenhouse effect would have diminished, causing the stars to be completely visible. A lot happened on Earth around 500 million years ago. This is when Oxygen levels are known to have spiked and plant and animal life first appeared (Shireen Gonzaga, 2011). Up until that point, God was terraforming the Earth to make it habitable for all life.

Genesis 1:20-23 Then God said, "Let the waters swarm with fish and other life. Let the skies be filled with birds of every kind." So God created great sea creatures and every living thing that scurries and swarms in the water, and every sort of bird-each producing offspring of the same kind. And God saw that it was good. Then God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply. Let the fish fill the seas, and let the birds multiply on the earth." And evening passed and morning came, marking the fifth day (yom/period).

Here, God begins creating life on earth. This period is known as the Cambrian explosion, which happened about 500 million years ago (Josh Davis, 2019). To this day, according to origin of life scientists, there are many hypotheses, but we still don’t know how life began on Earth (Sophie Bates, 2019). Evidence of the earliest known form of life on earth was a fossilized microorganism dating back to about 3.77 billion years. These organisms were important for the creation process because they were the precursors to the microorganisms that began creating oxygen on earth. Notice that during this period, God created life in the sea first which science agrees with. It also said that God let sea life multiply naturally “each producing offspring of the same kind” commanding them to “Be fruitful and multiply”. The Hebrew word translated as “swarm” is “saras” which means to teem, swarm, or multiply. Before this period ended, God filled the oceans with sea life, and we know that fish don't multiply overnight. They reproduced naturally until the oceans were filled. This is more evidence that the "day" was not a twenty-four hour period. These “yom” or “periods” were long processes. What we consider a long period of time, though, is not long to an infinite being. When you have an eternity of time, a billion years is a blink of an eye.

Also, ff you don’t pay close attention to this passage, you may miss one important detail. When you just glance over Genesis 1:20 in an English translated Bible, it may just seem as if God created sea life and birds and then moved onto the next period of creation.  Well, scientists have a theory that birds evolved from reptiles, so reptiles should have been created before birds, and if you don’t look closely at the Hebrew in this verse, then you miss this part of creation completely. In this passage, it says “and other life”. In some other English translations, it might read “the moving creature”. This is translated from the Hebrew word “seres” which means: “Teeming or swarming things, creepers, swarmers. Of insects, animals, small reptiles, quadrapods”. So, during this period mentioned in Genesis 1:20-23, life began in the waters (Cambrian Explosion about 500 million years ago), then insects (476 million years ago), then reptiles (350 million years ago)(this period would also have been when dinosaurs then evolved from the earliest reptiles) and finally flying creatures, which is translated from the Hebrew word “op” which means: “flying creatures, fowl, winged things”. The earliest known flying animal is the Pterosaur which existed at least 252.2 million years ago. The earliest known feathered “bird” is the Archaeopteryx and existed at least 150 million years ago. So far, the creation account falls in line with the general order of the scientific evolutionary timeline. After creating plants, sea life, insects, reptiles and flying creatures, God created land dwelling animals and finally humans. Let’s see if this period of creation also fits in with the generally accepted evolutionary timeline and order of appearance.

 

Genesis 1:24-31 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so. God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.” Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so. God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day (yom/period).

This is the final day/period of creation. Notice that the passage says "let the LAND produce living creatures".  This is translated from the Hebrew “yasa eres”, “yasa” which means: to go out, come out, exit, go forth”, and “eres” which means: Earth, land. God may have started the process of life in the water, but here it shows that he guided the process of the evolution of “living creatures” on land. “living creatures” in this passage is translated from the Hebrew word “nepes” which literally means “soul”, meaning that in this period, God created the creatures who have a soul, or are sentient beings that have or show a great deal of emotion compared to the rest of the animals. These were most likely mammals and animals that could be domesticated (dogs, cats, sheep, goat, cows, etc.), as the passage goes on to mention these “living creatures” are livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals. The first known mammal was the Morganucodon which existed as early as 200 million years ago (Encyclopedia Britannica, Paul Polly, 2022). The creation of “living creatures” also falls in line with the order of the evolutionary timeline.

Now we come to humans. According to this passage, God creates humans in His own image. What is odd here is that the word translated for “God” is “Elohim” and it is used in a plural sense. Some argue this as evidence of the holy trinity, and some make an argument that God created humans through angelic beings, who are also called “Elohim” or “the sons of God”. The latter supports the “ancient astronaut theory” which is somewhat popular today. Regardless, this passage shows that Humans were created apart from animals. That God/Elohim directly intervened to create us. We are definitely unique, and distinct from all other species on earth. It is believed that humans first appeared about 2 million years ago. Scientists classify a “human” as anyone who belongs to the genus “homo” (man). Scientists still don’t know when or how the first humans evolved (Becky Little, 2021) or appeared, though, modern humans (Homosapiens) are believed to have been around for the last 200,000 years. The earliest “humans” appeared 2 million years ago, and, in the eyes of the public, appear less human and more “bipedal primate”. It is possible that God/Elohim used these early creatures to create us, since there is some evidence to support that our DNA was tampered with in order to create us (Chromosome Fusion, Dr. Barry Starr, May 12, 2008). Humans are classified as primates, and part of the “great apes”. All of the other great apes have 48 chromosomes (24 pairs) and humans are the only ones that have 46 chromosomes (23 pairs). When comparing chromosomes between humans and the other great apes, it appears that two of the chromosomes that all other great apes have, had fused together with loss of data (The Origin of the Human Species: A Chromosome Fusion?, Manuel Rejon, January 17, 2017). It is believed that this loss of data actually benefitted us, which makes this fusion even more suspicious, and supports the theory of genetic tampering to create humans. Regardless of how we were created, we see that the Biblical order of all creation events fall in line with modern scientific theory of evolution and the origin of species as well as the formation of the Universe and Earth. The Bible doesn’t give specific timelines for each even, but given what we know from scientific studies, we can categorize each event within a known period in history, and therefore get a rough date for the order of events that are described in Genesis one.

 

CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE

13.8 bya: In the beginning God created the Heavens (Universe) (Genesis 1:1)

 

CREATION OF THE EARTH

4.5 bya: -and the Earth (Genesis 1:1)

 

CREATION DAY ONE

3-2.5 bya: Thick atmosphere which began thinning due to the production of oxygen from cyanobacteria allowing more light to shine on the Earth. Sun at 70% current brightness in this period (Genesis 1:2-5)

 

CREATION DAY TWO

2.5 bya-500 mya: God created the sky/troposphere/atmosphere (Genesis 1:6-8)

 

CREATION DAY THREE

​500 mya: God created plant life (Genesis 1:9-13)

 

CREATION DAY FOUR

500 mya: Earth further cooled, Oxygen levels increased, overcast diminished. Sun, moon, and stars are now clearly visible. (Genesis 1:13-19)

 

CREATION DAY FIVE

500-252 mya: Cambrian Explosion, sea life (500mya). Insects (476mya). Reptiles(350mya). Flying creatures (252mya) (Genesis 1:20-23)

 

CREATION DAY SIX

200mya-200,000ya: God creates mammals and finally humans. (Genesis 1:20-31)

 

CREATION DAY SEVEN

200,000ya-Current: God rested. We are still in this period.

 

And there you have it. A modeled timeline of the biblical creation account in Genesis one that parallels natural events described and dated in history by science. Is this all a coincidence, or evidence of Intelligent Design? So where does the common misconception that the bible says that the Earth is only 6000 years old come from? Is it possible that the Earth is much younger that science claims? I don’t believe it, but I don’t disbelieve it either. There are many well-structured young Earth creationist theories out there, and anything is possible with God. But given modern evidence, I believe that the Universe and Earth are very old. The reason that many people mainly believe in a young Earth (most commonly argued to be around 6000 years) though, is by adding up the genealogies given throughout the bible. This roughly takes you back 6000 years to when Adam and Eve were allegedly created in the Garden of Eden. Unbeknownst to most, this date for a young Earth is not even that old. It was first calculated by James Ussher (1581-1656), an Anglican Archbishop of Ireland. Before that, as early as the 10th century, there have been several Jewish Rabbi and Kabbalists that have calculated the age of the Earth anywhere from 40,000 years old to 2.5 billion years old. This 6000-year-old age of the Earth is relatively modern thinking, that is pushed by young Earth creationists. Other than how Genesis 1 can be modeled to align with modern science, there are a couple of other reasons that I don’t believe that the bible says that the Earth is only 6000 years old. To begin, Adam and Eve had eternal life when they were in the garden. We get a hint from this passage in Genesis.

Genesis 3:22 The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat and live forever.

According to the text, the tree of life was in the Garden of Eden as well as the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Both Adam and Eve were both allowed to eat from any tree in the garden except for the tree of knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 2:16-17). This means that they were eating from the tree of life, which gives eternal life. It wasn’t until after they broke God’s command that they were banned from eating from the tree of life. Another thing to think about is, if Adam and Eve had eternal life, how long were they in the garden until they were kicked out? A day? A year? 1000 years? Millions of years? They could have been in the garden enjoying life for eons. Surely it wasn’t: six days of creation, a day of rest, and then on the eighth day they sinned and were banished. In Genesis 5:5, it says that Adam lived 930 years, and many might argue that his creation must have been within those 930 years, but according to Genesis 2:17, God tells Adam that in the “day/yom” that he eats from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, that he will die. This “day” could not possibly mean a 24-hour period or God would be a liar. It also does not mean a day/period from the point of Adam’s creation, but from the period that he eats it, onward. Meaning, within a period after he eats it. From the time that Adam eats the fruit, his days were numbered, but before that they were not because he had eternal life. It is also a common teaching that this day is 1000 years. In Psalm 90:4, the psalmist says that “a day is like 1000 years to the Lord, and 1000 years like a day.” More evidence of this is that all of Adam’s descendants die within this day, or 1000-year period. No one after Adam lives over 1000 years, at least not according to the genealogies listed in Genesis. This curse of death within 1000 years not only applied to Adam, but also to his descendants. So, what God was telling Adam, was that if he ate the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, that he would not live beyond 1000 more years, from the time that he ate the fruit.

There is also the chance that much of the story of the Garden of Eden in Genesis 2 & 3 is poetry and/or mythology. For instance, we know that Satan was the serpent/snake in the story, but in reality, he is not actually a talking snake. He is a fallen angel of God. There is no instance in the bible of angels transforming into animals. This is clearly mythological or poetic symbolism, where a sly slithering serpent is being portrayed as humanity’s great advisory, Satan (Revelation 12:9 & Revelation 20:2). Also, the punishment of “the serpent” (God makes him crawl on his belly and eat the dust of the Earth) may have been used to explain why snakes don’t have legs, or how they lost them. We know God didn’t take Satan’s legs because in Job 1:7, when God asks Satan where he has come from, Satan says,” from going to and fro in the Earth, and walking up and down it.”

So, according to scripture, the universe, let alone the Earth, is not only 6000 years old. The 6000-year age is a modern dating that is pushed by young Earth creationists that believe every word in the bible is the inerrant word of God that must be taken literal. As we have examined so far, and will continue to see, that isn’t at all the truth. The bible is not the word of God, Jesus is. God’s words are found in the bible, but not every word is the word of God. The bible is full of God’s words, mythology, poetry, hyperboles, metaphors, history, prophecy, and apocalyptic visions. As 2 Timothy 3:16 says: All scripture is inspired, and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness.

​There are, however, other arguments for a young Earth. Many young Earth creationists argue that there is evidence that man lived alongside dinosaurs (Tollinger, Susan L., and William Trollinger, 2020), completely disbelieving and rejecting the theory of evolution. There are even old Earth creationists that believe the same to some degree. I, for one, don’t completely disbelieve that dinosaurs may have lived alongside humans, or some type of bipedal primate. Some of the evidence is very compelling, so let’s take a look at some of the evidence and consider the possibility of dinosaurs living among humans at some point in history.

Evolution

EVOLUTION

What is Evolution? The definitions of evolution are as follows:

 

1.  Biology- theory of development from earlier forms: the theoretical process by which all species develop from earlier forms of life.

According to this theory, natural variation in the genetic material of a population favors reproduction by some individuals more than others, so that over the generations all members of the population come to possess the favorable traits.

2.  Biology-developmental process: the natural or artificially induced process by which new and different organisms develop as a result of changes in genetic material  

3.  Gradual development: the gradual development of something into a more complex or better form


 

TYPES OF EVOLUTION

Let’s take a look at the different types of evolution. I’ll give a quick summery, and then go into each one a little more in depth.

Microevolution-Small changes in population over time, such as the color of moths or the size of bird's beak. Humans have also gone through small changes. We have evolved to adapt to our environment. Skin color, shapes of eyes, and height are a few ways that we have evolved.

 

Macroevolution- Development of new structures like wings, new organs or body parts. It is believed to happen over a very long time. Many small changes turning into a big change in biological structure like wings or new organs, as stated before.

 

Universal Common Descent- Organisms descending from a common ancestor. It is believed that both humans and chimpanzees both descended from a common ancestor.

 

Natural Selection- Survival of the fittest. It is believed that this is why some species are not around, or extinct. They could not make the adaptation to their environment so they could not survive.

 

MICROEVOLUTION

These changes might be caused by humans, such as the intentional breeding of different types of dogs into new breeds, or cross-cultivating some plants to bring out specific attributes. These attributes are already present in their DNA.

 

Microevolution is an "adaptation" rather than evolutionary mutation into a more complex life form.

 

Animals adapt to the changes in nature, even humans. 

 

For example:

 

•More dense populations statistically produce smaller animals and humans. Humans have also changed to adapt to their environment, such as their skin color or the shape of their eyes.

 

•The Galapagos finch beak size changed during a drought in 1977. Then after the drought ended, and the environment returned back to normal, the finch's beak returned back to its normal size. This small change is believed to have happened to help the change in the finch’s feeding habits. Although, there is speculation that during the drought, the smaller beaked finches either left, or died off, and then afterward, the smaller beak finches eventually returned to the island.

•The peppered moth in England during the Industrial Revolution, which over the course of a number of generations changed its coloring to better blend in with the soot-covered environment.

In all of these examples, as well as nearly every evolutionary example, all of these species stayed the same species. A human stayed a human, the finch stayed a finch, and the moth stayed a moth. As we will see, even in the fossil record, what is observed is that all "evolution" of species stays linear. Another animal never turns into another. It either dies off and becomes extinct, or it adapts to it's environment, or it migrates to escape an environmental change, in which case, the species doesn't need to make any change at all.

MACROEVOLUTION

Macroevolution- The random development of new structures like wings, new organs or body parts.

 

Macroevolution has never really been observed. In fact, most mutations did not result in a more complex organism. Most mutations observed have been harmful, such as extra body part, fingers, toes, arms, legs, etc.

 

It is believed that Macroevolution is the result of a lot of microevolution over a very long time. This is possible. The evolution of humans from more primitive apes, of whales and other sea life to land-dwelling mammals, and of complex vertebrates from worms, are all examples of macroevolution. There is absolutely no physical evidence of these types of macroevolution, and there are always, in every species, large holes, gaps, and “missing links”. The best evidence in the fossil record for macroevolution are a few whale fossils, and some land swelling animals that they believe evolved into the whale. The land swelling mammal dwarfs, in size, to the whale, especially a blue whale, and also, you can't test the DNA of fossils, so the fossil record is extremely unreliable when making such assumptions in the evolutionary change of a species. That is why evolution still, and most likely always will, remain a theory. Even bacteria, in the 150 years that we have been studying it, has not shown any observable evolutionary change. Bacteria's life span is short, and it reproduces quickly, so it is perfect for studying evolutionary change. Again, we have not observed any change. Also, concerning humans, many skeletons found of supposed early man, have turned up to be apes, or monkeys. According to Dr. Hugh Ross, an advocate for ID, we only have about a hotel room full of fossils of early humans, and their proposed ancestors. All of the skeletons found are nearly identical to an ape's skeleton. And if monkeys (or some distant relative) supposedly evolved into humans, then why are there still un-evolved apes and monkeys all over the world? If the world had changed that much that we had to adapt into what we are, then why hasn't any other primate species evolved into anything even remotely close to what we have. What happened to us to cause us to suddenly evolve intellectually, and become highly advanced, while our “fellow brethren” remained nearly unchanged?  We understand that many evolutionists argue that man is believed to have descended from a similar descendant as the chimpanzee, but chimpanzees are drastically unevolved compared to humans. If they evolved from a similar descendant, at a similar point in time, then they should have evolved to a more intelligent being by now. I'm not throwing evolution completely out of the bag though. There is evidence in scripture that God may have caused, and used macroevolution to create species. In Genesis, God said "let the ground produce vegetation", "let the water teem with living creatures", and "let the ground produce living creatures". In all of these instances, the Earth itself is producing the plant, sea life, or land animal. God is just guiding the process. When it comes to man though, God says "let us make man in our image". Meaning that God directly intervened, or created us with His own hand. Now, it is possible that he used an already created species such as a bipedal primate, to create us. There is genetic evidence that our chromosomes were tampered with, and fused together. Humans have 46 chromosomes, and great apes have 48. There is some research that supports that two chromosomes were fused together, but there is also research against it as well (https://www.icr.org/article/new-research-debunks-human-chromosome/). We also share some gene scarring with chimpanzees, that suggest that we both may have a common ancestor, or that God created us using this ancestor's genes, or part of them.

Another interesting thing to mention, is that there are generally three things that cause evolution, according to evolutionary biology, and that is; natural selection, random mutation, change in diet. In Genesis chapter 2, it begins a more detailed story (which may have been added) about man's creation. It says that God formed man out of the dust of the ground, but it doesn't give a time-lapse of this scenario. If he caused every land animal to "be produced from the ground", and he took genetic DNA from one  those animals to help produce us, then still, technically, He created us out of the dust of the ground. Also, Adam and Eve appear to go through an evolutionary change when they eat from the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. This is more evidence that evolution may have played a part in the creation of plants, sea life, animals, and possibly modern humans. With all this being said, it shows even more, that we don't need to deny science, just because we think it conflicts with God's existence, or scripture. It mean's we need to dig deeper and study more, to understand scripture and science. Studying science is just studying the observable universe, so we shouldn't be afraid of studying God's creation. Anything we discover should just prove his existence even that much more. Also, remember, scripture was written by humans, and Genesis is ascribed to Moses. If God told, or more than likely, showed Moses these things, Moses would have wrote them down in the way that he could understand best. He didn't know anything about Genetics, chromosomes, or evolutionary biology. The bible isn't a scientific book, and the people who wrote the books in it weren't scientist. God would not treat them as such. 

 

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

DNA is the genetic instructions for all living things.  Our DNA code instructs our development and functions.  I am sure that you have heard the term "its in their genes" before. Obesity, alcoholism, sexual addiction, homosexuality are some of the things that you may have heard of that are part of peoples genetic makeup. This is true, in fact, any kind of behavioral trait that you have, or acquire before you have children, can be passed down to your children. For example if your father was an alcoholic, that trait can be passed down to you. That does not mean that you are born an alcoholic, but what it does mean is that you are more susceptible to becoming one. You may even have an urge to begin, or try, drinking even though you have never drank before. Or you may never have an urge or problem with alcohol ever. It all depends on whether that "switch" is flipped on that trait. We all may have similar genetic traits but all may not be active. This is why some of us behave differently.

DNA is made up of 2 long chains of building blocks called nucleotides, wound around each other. I'm sure that you have seen a model of this somewhere in school or television. There are 4 different nucleotides that exist. They form a sequence that encodes a cells information (That's right, cells are full of information that tell them how to act, just like you). It takes many thousand nucleotides to make up a gene. As mentioned before hereditary traits are passed to offspring through DNA, but it relies on "faithful copying of a cells DNA into daughter cells." The entire set of DNA instructions that specifies a cell is called its genome. And in just one single cell there are 3 billion nucleotides. That's a lot of information, in just one single cell. Does that sound like an accident? Cells can even sense the environment through proteins in their membranes. Cells also use elaborate signal-transduction chemical pathways that can change cellular function. This is how we can adapt to our environment. Our Cell's signaling networks are very coordinated between different cells in different tissues. We may not look like it but we are very complex creatures.

 

DNA In Common

You might not think so, but we share much of our DNA with the rest of the world. Many scientists believe that we, as well as the other great apes, have all evolved from a common bipedal primate. This isn't hard to believe when you look at the world. Chimpanzee's have similar appendages to humans and they share 99 percent of their DNA with humans according to most sources (90% according to https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121106201124.htm). So its not hard to believe that we evolved from some similar primate if looking through the evolutionists eyes. But even a very small percentage of difference in DNA makeup, makes a HUGE difference in development and function. Humans share 99.9% of DNA. even .1 difference could result in an abnormal mutation or disfigurement. Scientists suggest that some of us may share up to 20% of our DNA with Neanderthals. Modern day humans supposedly evolved from Neanderthals some 40,000 years ago when they are believed to have gone extinct. 20% !? That means that we have an 80% difference in DNA makeup to Neanderthals. We share more DNA with rice than we do with Neanderthals. Considering that we have only a 1-10% difference in DNA makeup from Chimpanzee's and an 80% difference from our Neanderthal relatives, Here are some other animals as well as plants that humans share their genetic makeup with. While researching these I found many of  the numbers inconsistent, varying often according to different sources.

 

Animals

 Chimpanzee 98.5%

Mice 97.5%

Cat 90.2%

Dog 85%

Zebra Fish 84%

Cow 80%

Round Worm 70%

Fruit Fly 60%

 

Plants 

Pumpkin 75%

Cabbage 40-50%

Bananas 60%

Yeast 23%

(sources for these percentages vary, and were found by simply googling "how much DNA do we share with 'insert plant/animal'?" All percentages are easily verifiable in the same manner.)

 

Do you wonder how we could share DNA with other living things (plants and animals)? As mentioned before, according to scripture, all living things, including humans, came from the earth. Even though we were created in God's image, we also were created from the Earth, These finding can also show that we all were created from a common designer. 

 

VESTIGIAL ORGANS

Supporting the theory of evolution, were organs once named "vestigial organs" (leftover nonfunctional organs from our so-called early ancestors). This is false and science has proved so.

 

Some once named vestigial organs are:

 

•The Appendix which was believed to be a vestigial organ, but science has proved that it helps support the immune system.

•The tailbone or coccyx was believe to be a vestigial organ. It was believed to have been where our tail was, or our bipedal primate's tail, but it is in fact used for the attachment for our pelvic muscles. Although there are some people born with small tails, near the tailbone. These appendages are always completely unfunctional, and some don't even grow around the "tailbone" area. In one instance, a boy had one growing out of the back of his neck. As one source puts it, "According to experts, this human tail is not really a tail at all. It is thought to be a hiccup in the natural human development process and sometimes linked to spina bifida". There has not been a single known case of anyone with a fully functional tail. It is very rare to even happen, with only a few hundred cases documented worldwide over the past half-century. 

sources:

https://evolutionnews.org/2014/05/are_humans_ever/

https://www.babymed.com/fetal-malformations/vestigial-tail#

•The pituitary gland was believed to have been a vestigial organ. The pituitary gland secretes hormones that regulate homeostasis. These include tropic hormones that stimulate other endocrine glands. It is considered to be the "master gland".

•The tear glands were believed to have been vestigial organs. Believe it or not, it has been proved that they in fact produce tears.

•The spleen was once believed to be a vestigial organ. The spleen is an organ found in nearly all vertebrate animals. It plays an important role in red blood cells and the immune system. It removes old red blood cells and holds a reserve of blood, while also recycling iron. It also synthesizes antibodies, and removes antibody-coated bacteria along with antibody-coated blood cell.

 

•The pancreas was believed to have been a vestigial organ. The pancreas is a gland organ in the digestive and endocrine system of vertebrates. It is an endocrine gland that produces several important hormones, such as, insulin, glucagon, and somatostatins. It is also an exocrine gland that secretes pancreatic juice which contains digestive enzymes that pass to the small intestine. These enzymes help to further breakdown the carbohydrates, protein, and fat.

 

NOT ENOUGH TIME

The theory of Evolution suggests that plants and animals have developed from single celled organisms to what we see today in approximately 5 Billion years.

According to the Big Bang theory, and the speed that the galaxies are moving away from each other, the universe is estimated to be about 13.5-15 Billion years old.

Mathematically, given the circumstances that have to occur to produce a living cell, and the amount of time given (5 billion years), it is impossible.

Mathematically even 100 Billion years is not long enough to accidently produce Even One Single Cell!

 

An example of what has to occur:

  • Amino acids are made up of 4 elements; Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Carbon.

  • There are Left handed (L-Levo) and Right handed (D-Dextro) Amino acids.

  • There is an alphabet of 20 amino acids, which make up a protein.

  • The minimum number of amino acids in a protein is 410.

  • For a protein to work correctly the amino acids do not just have to combine; they need to combine in a specific sequence for the protein to function.

  • The smallest living organism that is able to duplicate itself is made up of 239 individual proteins.

  • It is one chance in 10123 (That’s a lot of zeros) for 410 amino acids to form in correct sequence. That is the chance to form only one protein. This would then have to occur 238 more times, randomly by accident, to put together the smallest living reproductive organism.

  • There are 4.73354x1017 seconds in 13.5-15 Billion years.

 

For this procedure to occur in the time supposedly given, and then for that life to "evolve" into the life we have today, without a designer, is impossible. For evolution to work, someone would have not only pressed the button to turn on the machine, but they would have had to also guide, and overse the process.

 

To conclude, with the given evidence, I cannot bring myself to believe that life evolved randomly by accident. When you observe the world, it appears that every living thing has a purpose to its life in the given environment that it has been placed. It appears that life has been created to co-exist with other life and support the functions of nature. This isn't just true for the Earth though, it it is true for the Universe. In every field of science, it appears that everything has been designed, and even the most devout athiests who are scientist agree to this fact, but their argument is "but it just isn't designed, it only appears designed".

The Fossil Record
DNA

THE FOSSIL RECORD

Punctuated Equilibrium suggests that evolution occurs during short periods of sudden, drastic change with long periods of little or no change. This does not solve the problem of missing links. It is basically an admission to dismiss the fact that there is no fossil evidence for gradual change in a species. In fact the fossil records show that animals tend to remain relatively unchanged throughout their time on Earth; not slowly developing into new species as evolution claims. In every case for a species' evolution, there is more than one missing link, spread over a vast amount of time. Many would have you believe that the evolution of the species has had billions of years to evolve, but that's not true when we look at the fossil record. According to the fossil record, all animals currently living only had about 500 million years to evolve. About 98% of Earth's species are extinct, and had even less time, than the species currently living, to evolve. According to the fossil record, those species that are now extinct just suddenly appeared, without explanation. Scientists call this sudden appearance the Cambrian Explosion.

The Great Unconformity

One of the greatest mysteries plaguing geologists, and paleontologist, is called the great unconformity. According to geologists, the earth is very old (about 4.5 billion years). Throughout the age of the Earth, layers of rock and soil piled atop one another, creating a uniform layer that coincides with a specific age of the Earth. This sits well with with evolutionist, and evolutionary paleontologist, because they propose that in each layer is a level of evolution of all the species on the Earth. One of the greatest problems with this (other than the vast amount of missing links, and that we don't see a gradual evolution of species) is that there is a missing layer found all over the world, in different locations. This layer, according to their dating methods, is a piece of Earth's history that dates between 100 million to 1 billion years. That is almost a billion years of history missing. As of now, there is no widely accepted explanation for this among scientist. One scientist, Dr. Kurt Wise (Ph.D. in paleontology, MA in geology) makes an argument for flood theory, that a great flood not only explains the great unconformity, but that the strata layers that we see today were laid down by a great worldwide flood. He also argues that the fossils found in the layers show now signs of gradual change (which he calls diversity before disparity) because these layers were created by this same flood. This diversity before disparity is made evident in the Cambrian layer of strata.

 

Cambrian Explosion

The Cambrian explosion, is also sometimes called the biological big bang. During the Cambrian explosion, fossils of at least 19-and as many as 50- radically new and complex animal groups, with radically different body types, appear suddenly at one time. The Cambrian age in the geologic time scale is dated by scientists as being about 530 million years old.  What is really interesting is not just what is found in this layer, but what is found in the layers above it, and what is not found in layers under it.  The Cambrian layer has virtually every phyla known to man.  Yes, all major body plants, and enormous varieties of each, all coexist in this layer.  No signs of evolution. The layers below the Cambrian have practically no fossilized specimen.  The few creatures that are found in pre-Cambrian strata are all soft-bodied organisms like worms.  So, you have no complex organisms pre-Cambrian, and then suddenly everything appears. As you move up the strata, and observe the most recent layer, we find that nearly 98% of all Cambrian period species have become extinct. Concerning the stratum layers there are:

 

  • A continuous deposition from beginning to end.

  • No erosion between layers.

  • Actual ripple marks in some layers

  • In some stratum layers there exists vertical tree trunks, with the same tree making its way up from top to bottom!

 

This evidence could lead one to believe that there was a great flood some time ago. That the stratum layers were formed by sediment, rapidly, piled on top one another by flood waters. We know that for an organism to become a fossil, that it has to be buried quickly before it can decompose, or be eaten by scavengers, and that is what we see in with the Cambrian Explosion. A rapid burial of organism.

What we can also deduce from this is, that A ton of animals suddenly appeared on the earth around the same time, and then most slowly died off. Because of this, the theory of evolution can only be true if Macroevolution is true. There is, however, no physical evidence for Macroevolution in the fossil record that does not require an great imagination. All "missing links" are either another species, or the same species form a different time. You would think that, because the way that scientists and museums portray fossils, that we have tons of fossilized evidence for these species. That's not true though. We all fall for the imagination of the secular scientists who want to wish God, and His creation, away. Almost all fossils are just fragments of was you see in pictures and museums. They only ever find a tooth here, a jaw there, a rib over there, and then they reconstruct an entire "missing link" out of what they find. The pictures that you see are just an archaeologist's imagination. I bought into the theory of evolution until I started researching evidence for evolution. In reality, almost all "evidence" for evolution of species is in the fossil record (the rest is in DNA studies), and the fossil record is not reliable, and appears largely made up. 

https://pandasthumb.org/archives/2008/03/disparity-diver.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Wise

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratum

https://eos.org/articles/erasing-a-billion-years-of-geologic-time-across-the-globe

https://www.britannica.com/science/Cambrian-Period/Cambrian-rocks

The Flood

The Flood and Evidence of Pre-flood Civilizations

Everyone knows the story of Noah's flood, or at the very least has heard about Noah and the great flood. Not everyone is familiar with the evidence that was left behind, giving truth to this ancient story. In almost every religion and culture (if not every), there exists a story about a great catastrophe, a flood.  As the story goes: A great deluge as some cultures call it, covered the whole earth and destroyed everything. Only one man and his family escaped by building a huge boat, an ark, as described in the book of Genesis. In the bible God saw that man was increasing in wickedness (Genesis 6:5) and that the earth was filled with violence because of men (Genesis 6:11-13). This grieved God to a point that He decided to destroy everything on the Earth; Man, women, children, and animals.

There is much evidence of a great flood all over the world. This includes great pre-flood civilizations. The bible doesn't say a whole lot about the civilizations that lived before the flood. Even the book of Enoch does not give a great description. Using the bible, and other sources, we can see that those who lived before the flood were not unintelligent, knuckle dragging cave men. There are still unanswered questions, and probably always will be, until we stand before the Lord. But from the evidence we have, we can see that man was highly intelligent from the beginning. They built great empires, they had intelligent forms of writing, they had schools, they forged metal, they used medicine, they played instruments and orchestrated music, they did surgery (even brain surgery), made glasses (eyewear), they made batteries, and they may even have been capable of flight and possibly nuclear war.

 

Ancient Pre-flood Stories

In almost every culture, and religion, there is a story told about a great catastrophe, a flood. If a great flood covered the earth, you can be sure of one thing, everyone that was left would talk about it, or record it, and continue passing that story down through the ages to come. That is my first premise, to argue as evidence for a flood. That if there truly was a great flood, we would find evidence of a record, of the said flood, in every, or the majority of every, ancient civilization. Which we do. Below are a list of many of the ancient civilizations around the world that have a flood story. Many of these civilizations never came in contact with each other, which would put to death the counter argument that the story spread from one civilization to the others.

 

Babylonia

Aside from the account given in Genesis, the Babylonian flood story in the epic of Gilgamesh is probably the most renowned. It is found on a seal found at Tell Billa near Nineveh. In the epic of Gilgamesh (the 5th king of the Erech dynasty) Gilgamesh journeys to an island where Utnapishtim (Noah) lives in search for the secret of eternal life which Utnapishtim (Noah) was supposed to possess. In his reply Utnapishtim (Noah) tells him the account of the flood. In the passage he tells him:

 

"The assembly of the gods decided to send a deluge. They said, on the sinner let his sin rest. O man of Shuruppak, build a ship, save your life. Construct it with six stories, each with seven parts. Smear it with bitumen inside and outside. Launch it upon the ocean. Take into the ship seed of life of every kind. I built it. With all that I had I loaded it, with silver, gold, and all living things that I had. I embarked upon the ship with my family and kindred. I closed the door. The appointed time arrived. I observed the appearance of the day. It was terrible. All light was turned to darkness. The rains poured down. The storm raged; like a battle charge on mankind. The boat trembled. The gods wept. I looked out upon the sea. All mankind was turned to clay, like logs floating about. The tempest ceased. The flood was over. The ship grounded on Mt. Nazir. On the seventh day I sent out a dove; it returned. I sent out a swallow; it returned. I sent out a raven; it alighted, it waded about; it croaked; it did not return. I disembarked. I appointed a sacrifice. The gods smelled the sweet savor. They said, let it be done no more. They said, in former times Utnapishtim was a man; now let him be like us immortal; and let him dwell afar off, at the mouth of the rivers. "

Ancient Greece

In ancient Greek mythology, Zeus sees man’s wickedness and sends a flood to destroy the Bronze Age. Deucalion was warned by other gods. Advised by his father Prometheus, Deucalion builds a chest for him and his wife to survive in during the flood. Everyone perishes except for a few that escaped to the tops of high mountains. Deucalion and his wife Pyrrha survive and make it through the flood after the chest comes to rest atop of Mt. Parnassus.

Hindu

A great flood is mentioned in several ancient texts, particularly the Satapatha Brahmana. As it goes, Manu was warned to build a ship because of a coming flood. He was protected by Matsya, avatar of lord Vishnu. The flood destroyed all of the wicked to save the pious, animals and plants.

   

China

There are a number of different versions of the "Nuwa" myths. Notice how closely "Nuwa" resembles "Noah". The Nuwa myth is written in the Zun Nanzi. One Myth is that water poured down from the sky because of a fight between two gods that damaged the foundation of the heavens. Nuwa patched it with colored stone, which resembles the rainbow.

Another story held by Chinese tradition is that Fa-He, founder of Chinese civilization, is represented as having escaped from a flood sent because man had rebelled against heaven. He escapes with his wife, 3 sons, and 3 daughters.

The Egyptians

The Egyptians had a legend that the gods at one time purified the earth by a great flood. Only a few shepherds escaped in a mountain.

England

The Druids had a legend that the world had been repopulated from a righteous patriarch who had been saved in a strong ship from a flood sent by the Supreme Being to destroy man for his wickedness.

Polynesians

Polynesians have stories of a flood from which only 8 people escaped in a canoe.

 

Mexicans

Mexicans have a story in which one man, his wife, and children were saved in a ship from a flood which overwhelmed the earth.

 

Peruvians

Peruvians have a story in which one man and woman were saved in a box that floated on the flood waters.

American Indians

American Indians have legends in which 1, 3, or 8 people were saved in a boat above the waters on a high mountain.

 

Greenland

In Greenland there is a story that the earth once tilted over, and all men were drowned, except one man and one woman, who repopulated the earth.

 

Although all of these stories are not exactly the same, one thing does remain true. All of these cultures believed that at one time there was a great flood that came upon the earth. Scientists look for other explanations and speculate about the flood stories and find them just that, stories. Their only other option is to believe in God. There are, however, other possible explanations for the great flood stories. Some are:

 

  • Origins of flood myths are believed to have originated from ancient civilizations observing seashells and fish fossils found inland and on the tops of mountains. Observations of these kinds have been recorded by Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, and Chinese.

  • Some Geologists believe that great flooding of rivers may have caused stories.  

  • The Ryan-Pitman theory argues that there was a catastrophic deluge about 5600BC from the Mediterranean Sea into the black sea. This large, but "local flood" caused a greatly exaggerated story that spread from the civilizations in the area, to the rest of the world.

  • Some flood stories are believed to have derived from coastal flooding or Tsunamis. There has been speculation that flood stories came from a Tsunami that hit the South Aegean Sea and Crete about 1630-1600BC but this is very out of date from many of the other flood stories.  

  • Some scientists believe that a meteor may have hit in the Indian Ocean about 3000-2800BC and caused inland flooding as well as the Burckle crator.

  • Graham Hancock, a British writer and journalist, has done extensive research that shows that there may have been a worldwide flood around 12,000 BCE. If proven true, this may be the flood that all other stories have derived from in some shape or form. 

 

Physical Evidence for a Flood

My next premise is that if there truly was a flood then there should be physical evidence left behind such as millions of tons of flood sediment, large animal graveyards, and ancient pre-flood civilizations that were destroyed. It just so happens that all of this has been found, but it is widely ignored, or scientists have found a way to categorize these finds in a way that we are virtually blind to see them.  

 

The Geological Strata and Polystrate Trees

Fossils cannot be carbon dated, because a fossil is a rock (though rocks can be dated), and not actually the organism. So, fossils are categorized by age by using the strata in which they are found. But who says how old a geological strata is? And where did all these "layers" of strata come from? It is all THEORY that was created to help support the categorization of another theory called evolution. Another theory found inside the theory of evolution is, uniformitarianism, and it states: The way everything is occurring today is the way it has always occurred on our planet. So those who accept evolution and the strata theory say:

 

“Since no more than an inch of sediment is presently being laid down each year in most non-alluvial areas, therefore, no more than this amount could have been deposited yearly in those places in the past.“ And… “Since there are thick sections of rock containing fossils, therefore, those rocks and their contents must have required millions of years to be laid down.”

 

But, we find many different layers of strata that appear to have been laid down suddenly. There have even been trees that are found going up through different strata. These are called polystrate trees, and there are whole forests found that are polystrate. In a mine in Tasmania a miner’s hat was found that was fossilized within 50 years. This helps provide evidence that fossils don't take incredibly long periods of time to develop, just a lot of pressure. The observation of polystrate trees show that the many layers of strata appear due to the great flood, rather than over millions and millions of years of sediment being laid down as suggested by the uniformitarianism principle, and the fossilized miner's hat proves the pissibility that fossils may not be as old as scientists say.

 

Flood Sediment

Evidence in Iraq has revealed flood sediment from Shuruppack (modern day Tell Fara in Iraq). Uburratum, the 9th preflood king, (according to the inscription on the Weld prism) ruled over this city. The flood sediment extends as far as Kish. Ruins and other archeological finds are found immediately below the sediment.

Ur

At Ur, the city of Abraham, a joint expedition of the University Museum of Pennsylvania and the British Museum, under the leadership of Dr. C. L. Wooley found a great bed of solid, water-laid clay 8 feet thick under several strata of human occupation. And immediately below the solid water-laid clay was found the ruins of a city. Dr. Wooley stated that 8 feet of sediment implied a very great depth and a long period of water, that it could not have been put there by any ordinary overflow of rivers, but only by some such large force such as the biblical flood account. The civilization underneath the flood layer was so different from that above it that it indicated to Dr. Wooley "a sudden and terrific break in the continuity of history".

Kish

At Kish on the east edge of Babylon on a bed of the Euphrates which is now dry, was said (according to the tablets) to have been the first city to be re-built after the flood. A joint expedition of the Field museum and Oxford University, led by Dr. Stephen Langdon found a bed of clean water-laid clay in the lower strata of the ruins of Kish. The clay deposit was 5 feet thick. Like the clay deposit in Ur, it indicated a great flood. Underneath this sediment was found an ancient civilization with relics that were of an entirely different culture than those above the strata.

Fara

Supposedly the traditional home of the biblical Noah. Fara lies halfway between Babylon and Ur. Dr. Eric Schmidt, of the University Museum of Pennsylvania, unearthed three cities built atop one another. The first one was contemporary with the 3rd Ur dynasty. The middle city was of early Sumerian. Then there was a layer of deposit which consisted of yellow dirt, a mixture of sand and clay. It was another water-laid sediment of solid earth. Just like the others, there were no relics of human occupation found in it. Immediately underneath were the remains of a city that appeared to have been hastily evacuated.

 

Nineveh

In Nineveh there was also another deposit of water-laid clay some 8 ft thick. The pottery above and below the clay deposit was said by Mallowan, director of the British Museum excavations at Nineveh, to differ greatly in culture from each other.

 

Dinosaurs

Yes, there is even evidence of the dinosaurs being destroyed by a great flood. There are large "boneyards" of dinosaur fossils piled together, under sediment. If there was a great flood, you can be sure that there would be plenty of sediment, mud, and rocks pushed around to cover up the dinosaurs, for instance, ten thousand Hadrosaur fossils were found in egg mountain, Montana, covered up possibly by flood sediment. Eggs don't grow legs and walk into tar pits and wait to turn into fossils. Especially not 10,000 of them. Here are a list of other places where dinosaur boneyards are found:

  • The Morrison beds in North America

  • Montana

  • The Rocky Mountains

  • Alberta

  • The Dakotas

  • China

  • Colorado

  • Utah

  • Africa

So, were these large fossil graveyards evidence for a sudden catastrophe, such as a flood, or the work of something else. We know that for a fossil to occur, the organism needs to be covered up fairly rapidly, by sediment, soon after death. These large fossil graveyards are another indication that a worldwide flood may have happened.

Evidence atop the Mountains

More evidence of a catastrophic flood can be found atop some mountains around the world. This evidence includes fossils such as whale bones, and mollusks. Fossils are generally found deep in rock layers, not on top of mountains. Mountains are believed to have been formed over millions of years due to the collision of tectonic plates. Many scientists believe that these fossils first formed underwater before the mountain surfaced millions of years ago, but the marine fossils found on these mountains are of closer modern day "un-evolved" animals. This causes an anomaly in their theory, which they won't tell you about, or address, because it causes them to have to consider that the strata may not fit their timescale, forcing them to throw away ,and reconstruct, their biased theories. If I may digress, in the scientific field, when you create a hypothesis, you must also create an experiment to prove your hypothesis true. If your experiment proves your hypothesis true, then it becomes a theory. This theory is forever in a state of limbo where experiments are done to try to prove the theory as untrue. If you find an issue to prove the theory untrue, then you must consider the theory untrue, and a new theory must me created that falls within the bounds of the evidence as true. What we see today in the scientific fields, are scientists with a biased secular humanistic agenda.  As written in their humanist manifesto III, one of their main theories that they uphold are:

 "Humans are an integral part of nature, the result of evolutionary change, an unguided process."

They must uphold this theory, which causes them to be biased, and only look for evidence that proves their theory to be true if it is "unguided", throwing out any evidence that proves their theory to be false, because it would cause them to not only have to reconstruct their theories, but also to consider an intelligent designer of the universe. Many modern day scientist, such as Richard Dawkins, signed this humanist manifesto, which proves their biasness. Anything that may give evidence to the Bible being true, or to God's existence, will be thrown out and pushed aside. Now, let us consider the evidence atop the mountains.

Mount Sanhorn

As high as we can climb we find marine fossils. Fossils of fish, shells, and mollusks. A whale's skeleton was found on the top of Mount Sanhorn on the Arctic Coast as well.

 

Andes Mountains

Whale fossils, and other marine fossils, have been found high up in the Andes Mountains 5,000-13,000 feet high.

California

Skeletons have been found a mile high on California's coast range.

Himalyas

Marine fossils have been found on the Himalayas.

Ural Mountains

In the Ural Mountains, in Russian, near the Arctic Ocean, are many marine fossils, such as, sponges and other microbial bound stones that make up a reef. Fish and other shelled creatures were also found.

Beartooth Range, Montana

In Beartooth Range, 10,500 feet up, geologists have found fish fossils.

Carpathian Mountains

The Carpathian Mountains house tons of fossils. Fish fossils have been found atop this mountain range that spans 1500km across central and Eastern Europe.

 

We can see a trend. All across the world, possibly on every mountaintop, you can find fossils of marine life. The question is, did it end up there due to a great flood, tectonic plate upheaval, or a mixture of both? For an example of the biasness in the modern scientific community, let's take the Himalayas. They are believed to have been created from tectonic upheaval about 40-50 million years ago. and modern whales are only believed to have been around 34 million years. To explain the whale jawbone found on the Himalayas, scientists suggest that the jawbone was an evolutionary stage, which they called Himalayacetus subathuensis, of a land dwelling whale, that lived around 53 million years ago. So, they found a jawbone of a whale, on land, and said it was a land dwelling whale ancestor. This is all completely fabricated. Mind you, there is NO OTHER fossils of this proposed missing link of whales, which means that other than the fact that it was found on a mountain, there is no other evidence that can suggest that it was land dwelling. Their only other option would be to reconstruct their geological and fossil timeline theories, and/or consider a great flood that covered the mountaintops, both of which would possibly give credit where it's due, and that's to God. This constantly happens in the scientific community, due to biased secular humanistic agendas which try to keep any evidence that points to the Bible being true, or God's existence, buried.

Evidence in the Desert 

In the Atacama Desert near Copiapo, Chile, in South America, many whale fossils are being unearthed atop a desert hill more than half a mile away from the surf. Many of the whales seemed to have died suddenly, and right next to each other, some being only a few meters away.  Scientists, believe that they died some 2 million years ago, but they have no evidence of what killed them. Much like other marine graveyards that we see where marine life is piled atop one another or die right beside each other suddenly, these events may have been caused by a catastrophic global flood.

 

Mount St. Helens

Mount St. Helens is an active volcano located 96 miles from Seattle Washington and 50 miles from Portland, Oregon. Mount St. Helens is famous for its catastrophic eruption on May 18, 1980. What we are going to examine is not the eruption itself but the outcome of the catastrophe which shows evidence that massive erosion does not take millions of years.

Following the first eruption, great erosion took place over the next few years. Stratified layers up to 400 feet thick formed from mudslides and pyroclastic flow. Fine Laminate formed from 1 millimeter to 1 meter high in just a few seconds. On June 12, 1980 a deposit 25 feet in thickness containing upwards 100 thin layers accumulated in just one day. On March 19, 1982 a small eruption melted accumulated snow in the crater and caused mudslides, and waves of water, that carved a canyon 140 feet deep in some spots.  

The following quote was taken from a commentary by Ken Ham of AIG that was submitted in May 2000 to a few newspapers in the United States to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the eruption of Mount St. Helens in America’s Pacific Northwest.

"The events associated with the volcano’s explosion accomplished in seconds, hours, or just a few days, geologic work that normally would be interpreted as having taken hundreds or even millions of years. One particular canyon was formed, which has since been named the “Little Grand Canyon”. About 100 feet deep and somewhat wider, it is about 1/40th the scale of the mighty Grand Canyon. This canyon was formed in one day from a mudflow. A newly formed river then flowed through the Canyon formed by the mudflow."

One argument that atheistic scientists use, to deny the existence of an intelligent designer, is to say that the universe, and the things in it, only "appear" designed. If we take the case of Mount St. Helens, and apply the same logic, we could argue that the world's mountains, and strata, only "appear" to have taken a very long time to form, since we have observable evidence that such formations do not necessarily take a very long time, as proposed.

 

Pre-flood Civilizations

Amidst the Physical evidence of an actual occurrence of a flood, we can look to those who lived before the flood as evidence. History shows that civilizations started popping up all over the world rather quickly, in places like South America, Egypt, Babylon, India, and China, and around the same time throughout history. It was as if some great catastrophe wiped out everything and then we repopulated the earth. Is their evidence of ancient pre-flood civilizations? Apart from the archaeological evidence in "flood sediment" section earlier, consider the following.

 

Metal Forging

According to our textbooks there is a three age system for categorizing human prehistory. There was a Stone Age which lasted approximately 3.4 million years, and ended between 4500BC-2000BC. Then there was a Bronze Age around 3000BC, then the Iron Age started around 1200BC-1000BC. The great flood is estimated to have been between 4500BC-3500BC. As soon as Noah came out of the ark, we can be sure that he didn't start forging metals. He probably used stone or what he had available. But after civilization began to cultivate, men quickly started forging metals.

Evolution declares that modern anatomically correct humans have been around for only 200,000 years, and that our "ancestors" in the homo genus go back to about 2.3-2.4 million years ago. How did it take so long for us to start forging metals before the flood, but after the flood, we quickly advanced into an intelligent race of people? Are our history books wrong? It’s not that our history books are wrong, it’s that scientists keep things (artifacts and other important finds) from the public, because they do not fit into their categorization of the human history of evolution. They call these finds "anomalies". Then they throw them aside hoping that they can categorize them at a later date, if their theory permits. All more proof of the secular humanist agenda, and how they have invaded all fields of science to blind us from God. Let’s look at some of the evidence of ancient metal forging.

 

Iron pot found in coal

In 1912 a man named Frank Kennard reportedly found an iron pot  in a lump of coal while working in a coal mine in Arkansas. The original coal bed was reportedly mid Pennsylvanian age, which means that this artifact was approximately 300,000,000 years old. The report of the account was written at a much later date by the man that had made the find. It reads:

 

Sulphur Springs, Arkansas

Nov. 27, 1948

 

While I was working in the Municipal Electric Plant in 1912,

I came upon a solid chunk of coal which was too large to use. I broke it with a sledge hammer. This iron pot fell from the center, leaving the impression, or mold of the pot in a piece of the coal. Jim Stull (an employee of the company) witnessed the breaking of the coal, and saw the pot fall out. I traced the source of the coal, and found that it came from the Wilburton, Oklahoma Mines.

 

Signed: Frank J. Kennard

 

Sworn to before me, in Sulphur Springs, Arkansas, this 27th day of November, 1948.

Jullia L. Eldred N.P. My commission expires May 21, 1951 - Benton Co.

 

Man-made brass bell

A man-made brass bell with an iron clapper was reportedly found in a lump of coal by a 10 year old boy. On the top of the bell it looks like there is an image of an idol. The lump of coal that contained the bell was mined in Upshur County, West Virginia at a depth that dates this artifact as old as 300 million years, if indeed the strata layers tell the truth about the age of the earth.

 

The Bible

In the beginning of the book of Genesis, in chapter 4 we find the story about Cain and Able. Cain kills able and is banished. After being banished, what does Cain do? He began building a city! If he already knew how to build a city, then there must have been other cities in his day. Farther down the line of Cain's descendants is born Jubal, who is "the father of all who play the harp and flute. Musical instruments, it seems, were quite an early invention. The one that I really want to talk about is Tubal-Cain, the son of Lamech and Zillah, who "forged all kinds of tools out of bronze and iron", as quoted in the book of Genisis. According to modern textbooks the Iron Age didn't come until around 1200BC. Perhaps it wasn't in mass production until 1200BC but we can clearly see that, according to scripture, man already knew how to make bronze and iron long before 1200BC.

 

The Book of Enoch (1 Enoch)

Near the beginning of the book of Enoch, it begins explaining about "the watchers" and when they came down to take women for themselves. They had children that were giants. Those giants were called Nephilim. The book of Enoch explains that this is where we got our knowledge about metal forging, medicines, astrology, alchemy, etc. According to 1 Enoch 8:1-4 from the book of Enoch:

Azazel taught humans to make swords, knives, shields, breastplates, and showed them metals of the earth and the art of alchemy, and bracelets and ornaments, the use of antimony and paint, the beautifying of the eyelids, the use of all types of precious stones, and all sorts of dyes. Then wickedness and immorality increased, and they disobeyed, and everything they did was corrupt.

Semjaza taught spell potions, and root cuttings,

Armaros taught the resolving of spell potions,

Baraqijal taught astrology,

Kokable taught the constellations,

Ezeqeel taught the knowledge of the clouds,

Araqiel the signs of the earth,

Shamseil the signs of the sun,

And Sareil the course of the moon.

The Weld Prism

The Weld prism is the first known outline of world history. It was written approximately 2170 BC by a scribe named Nur-Ninsubur. It gives a list of kings from the beginning of the human race (pre-flood kings) up until the scribes own time. It was found a few miles north of ancient Ur (Where Abraham the patriarch came from) at Larsa, modern day Iraq. It lists "10 long-lived kings" that lived before the flood. It lists them “long-lived” because of the extremely long life that they lived, as it does in the book the Genesis. The 10 long lived kings are listed living much longer than people in the book of Genesis. After the tenth king it says that a great flood overthrew the land. But the other important part that I want to get to is where the scribe lists that the 3rd, 5th, and 6th kings reigned. He lists them reigning in a place called "Badgurgurru" which means "City of workers in bronze".

Ruins of Asmar

In 1933 Dr. H. E. Frankfort reportedly discovered an iron sword in the ruins of Asmar. The ruins are found 100 miles northeast of Babylon. The sword dated back to 2700BC, well before the 1200BC Iron Age timeline. Just to note, other than this bit of information I can find no more evidence of this sword, not even a picture.

 

The Cities of the 10 long-lived kings

As stated earlier, the Weld prism has a list of 10 long-lived kings inscribed on it. The prism also lists the cities in which they reigned. 10 kings that reigned in six different cities. Five of these cities have been identified and excavated. Badgurgurru has not been identified, but according to what its name means (city of workers in bronze) I think it is safe to assume that they forged metal. The names five cities that were found are as follows: Eridu, Larsa, Larak, Sippar (Accad), and Shuruppak (Fara). Among those cities are Obeid, Erech, Susa, Tepe Gawra, Ur, Kish, and Jemdet Nasr.  In every city listed there is evidence of metal use and forging. Many artifacts have been found such as copper axes, copper mirrors, hoes, sickles, and fish hooks. Among these artifacts there have been found painted pottery, flint implements, tools of obsidian (volcanic glass), turquoise vases, implements of stone, flint, quartz, models of boats, an underground kiln with specimens vitrified pottery, cosmetics which pre-historic women used for darkening their eyebrows and eyelids, brick ruins of temples painted red or covered with plaster, pottery artistically painted in intricate geometric patterns and figures of birds, even a chariot, and architectural  accomplishments that indicate an astonishingly advanced civilization.

THE NEW TESTAMENT

 

The old testament records from the beginning of creation until the time of Jesus. The New Testament is the record of Jesus and his apostles. Not many know how the New testament came to be. It was a long process from then until now, and it is common talk among skeptics  that its validity can't be trusted. Can it be trusted? How was it assembled? Who wrote it? Let's take a look.

 

How we got the New Testament

The reliability of New Testament scripture faces much scrutiny. I often meet others who think that the books of the bible, old and New Testament, are not a reliable source. Many believe that most of the books of the New Testament were not even written by the proclaimed authors. In the early church they faced the same conflicts within the church that we do now. I believe the conflict in history is repeating itself due to ignorance of early church history today. In this section I will give an account of the research that I have done in defense of the New Testament scripture and its reliability.

 

Common Era

CE is an abbreviation for "Common Era". It is an alternative to AD. BCE is an abbreviation for Before Common Era and is equivalent to BC. For this section I will use CE in reference to the dating of New Testament books. The use of AD was introduced in the 6th century by a Christian monk, intending the life of Jesus to be the reference date. Meaning that the year 1 AD would be Jesus's first year of life. But it is believed by many scholars that Jesus was born between 2 and 5 BC.

Eusebius: An Early Church Father

Eusebius was an early church father who lived 260 CE to 339 CE. He kept an account of the early church. With the evidence he had, he compiled a record of the early church from the Lord's apostles up until his time. His writings have survived up until this time and are available to anyone who wants a copy of his work.

In his writings Eusebius lists the books that were reliable and those that were in circulation in his time that were believed to be false. He gives evidence of their reliability, trying to prove that they were written by the apostles, and were in circulation during the mid to late first century (50-99 CE). Eusebius also gives evidence of their reliability by showing that the 2nd generation disciples, in the early second century quoted from the books, meaning that they were in circulation during the early second century (early 100 CE).

Eusebius also makes a claim to a letter written by Jesus himself to King Abgar. I will start with this letter since I find that it is fascinating and that it is never heard of in church assemblies or anywhere else today. It is possible that there may be a copy of the letter, or the letter itself, in the Vatican archives since Eusebius was catholic and he had retrieved the letter himself. As far as I know the only remaining account of this letter is in Eusebius record. Eusebius wrote:

 

"Because of his miraculous powers the divinity of Christ was noised abroad everywhere, and myriads even in foreign lands remote from Judea came to him in the hope of healing from diseases of every kind. Thus, when King Abgar V, the celebrated ruler of peoples beyond the Euphrates, was suffering terribly from an incurable illness and often heard the name of Jesus and his miracles, he sent him a request, via letter carrier, pleading for relief from his disease. Jesus did not consent to his request at the time but favored him with a personal letter, promising to send one of his disciples to cure the disease and bring salvation to him and his relatives.

The promise was soon fulfilled. After his resurrection and ascension, Thomas, one of the Twelve, was divinely inspired to send Thaddeus, one of the Seventy, to Edessa as preacher and evangelist, who fulfilled all the terms of our Savior's promise. There is written evidence of this taken from the archives at Edessa, the then royal capital, which include ancient history as well as the events at Abgar's time. Here are the letters themselves which I have extracted from the archives and translated word for word from the Syriac:"

COPY OF A LETTER WRITTEN BY ABGAR THE TOPARCH

TO JESUS, SENT TO HIM AT JERUSALEM

BY THE COURIER ANANIAS

 

Abgar Uchama, the Toparch, to Jesus the excellent Savior who has appeared in the region of Jerusalem, greeting.

I have heard about you and the cures you accomplish without drugs or herbs. Word has it that you make the blind see and the lame walk, that you heal lepers and cast out unclean spirits and demons, and that you cure those tortured by chronic disease and raise the dead. When I heard all these things about you, I decided that one of two things is true: either you are God and came down from heaven to do these things or you are God's Son for doing them. For this reason I am writing to beg you to take the trouble to come to me and heal my suffering. I have also heard that the Jews are murmuring against you and plot to harm you. Now, my city-state is very small but highly regarded and adequate for both of us.

 

(He wrote this letter when the divine light has only begun to shine on him. It is appropriate to hear also the letter that Jesus sent him by the same letter carrier. It is only a few lines long but very powerful :)

THE REPLY OF JESUS TO THE TOPARCH

ABGAR BY THE COURIER ANANIAS

 

Blessed are you who believed in me without seeing me! For it is written that those who have seen me will not believe in me and that those who have not seen me will believe and live. Now regarding your request that I come to you, I must first complete all that I was sent to do here, and, once that is completed, must be taken up to the One who sent me. When I have been taken up, I will send one of my disciples to heal your suffering and bring life to you and yours."

 

This letter is among the accepted writings that Eusebius declared as being true. There were many other books and writing accepted in Eusebius’ time. They are the same books that we have available to us even today.

The Accepted Books

These are the books most accepted and credible in Eusebius' time (260-339CE):

 

  • The Four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John)

  • The Acts of the Apostles

  • All of the Epistles of Paul

  • 1 John

  • 1 Peter

  • Revelation

 

The Disputed Books

Aside from the books that were accepted as Canonical in Eusebius' time were the other books that we have in the New Testament and some that are not. They were used, but widely disputed, mainly because there were no quotation or mention of these books in the earliest church father's writings. The disputed books that are in our New Testament in the bible today are as follows:

 

  • James

  • Jude

  • 2 Peter

  • 2nd and 3rd John

 

The disputed books that were used, and known to most of the church in Eusebius' time, but are not included in our New Testament in our bible are as follows:

 

  • The Acts of Paul

  • The Shepherd of Hermas

  • Revelation of Peter

  • Epistle of Barnabas

  • Teachings of the Apostles (Didache)

 

Writings by the Heretics

Among the known and used books were writings published by persons known in Eusebius' time to be heretics using the apostles' names. These books are warned about by Eusebius. He writes, "The type of phraseology used contrasts with apostolic style, and the opinions and thrusts of their contents are so dissonant from true orthodoxy that they show themselves to be forgeries of heretics. Accordingly, they ought not be reckoned even among the spurious books but discarded as impious and absurd. “He also states that there are other "Gospels" and "Acts" that are penned under the apostles' names and he warns about them also. He gives a list as follows:

 

  • The Gospels of Peter

  • The Gospel of Thomas

  • The Gospel of Matthias

  • Other Gospels not listed in the Canonical or disputed books

  • The Acts of Andrew

  • The Acts of John

  • Other Acts not listed in the Canonical or disputed books

 

The Four Gospels

The Four Gospels are as follows: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. There are "OTHER" gospels out there and I will make mention of them later.  Matthew and John are the only two original disciples, of the Lord, that we know of that wrote a gospel (canonized) of the Lord.  Eusebius writes, “Thus they proclaimed the kingdom of heaven to all the world and gave little thought to writing books." Remember, they were still waiting for the Christ to come back, so most of those who wrote probably did not write until late in their life.

 

The Gospel of Matthew

Matthew was believed to have been written as early as 60CE. The earliest known fragment that we have is dated to 150-200 CE. According to Eusebius, Matthew first preached to the Hebrews, and then when he had decided to go preach further into the world he wrote an account of Jesus' ministry to leave behind to his people.

 

The Gospel of John

John was believed to have been written as early as 80CE. The earliest known fragment that we have dates back to 125-160CE. John wrote his gospel much later in his life. According to Eusebius, John wrote his Gospel after all three of the other gospels ended up in his possession. It is said that he welcomed them and affirmed them. Then after reviewing them he wrote his own gospel because the others lacked the account of what Christ had done at the beginning of his mission.  John was the youngest of the apostles and reportedly lived to be 94 years old and died about 100CE peacefully at an old age. There are other accounts of John from early church fathers. The most famous would be Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna (69-155CE) who was a disciple of John.  If the account is true about John personally writing his gospel after receiving and affirming the other three gospels, then we know for sure that those three gospels were in circulation in the mid-late first century (50-100CE).

 

The Gospel of Mark

Eusebius also writes that before Matthew wrote his gospel, Mark and Luke were already in circulation.  Mark was believed to have received his information from Peter, according to Papias. Papias was an early church father who was born before 70CE and died 155CE. In one of his writings he says, ''The Presbyter (speaking of John the apostle) used to say this also: "Mark became Peter's interpreter and wrote down accurately, but not in order all that he remembered of the things said and done by the Lord. For he had not heard the Lord or been one of his followers, but later, as I said, a follower of Peter. Peter used to teach as the occasion demanded, without giving systematic arrangement to the Lord's sayings, so that Mark did not err in writing down some things just as he recalled them. For he had one overriding purpose: to omit nothing that he had heard and to make no false statements in his account."

 

The Gospel of Luke

Luke, as he states himself at the beginning of the gospel, gathers all the evidence that he could from every source the he could.  He was a gentile physician from Antiochene. He was also a close companion of Paul. Luke was believed to have been written as early as 60CE .The earliest fragment that we have for Luke is dated between 175-250CE.

 

 

The Acts of the Apostles

Since the gospel of Luke was found credible so was the Acts of the Apostles, since the two go together and were penned by the same author. Luke, in his time, not only took in evidence to write his gospel but he also wrote what the apostles did immediately following Jesus’ death and resurrection. The Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts are meant to be read back to back. The book of Acts was believed to have been written as early as 60 CE and the earliest known fragment that we have today is dated to 250CE.

 

Paul's Epistle's

All of Paul's epistles were accepted as canonical in Eusebius' time, except for the book of Hebrews. The book of Hebrews was disputed among some. Concerning Paul's epistles, Eusebius writes, "Paul was obviously the author of the fourteen letters, but some dispute the epistle to the Hebrews in view of the Roman church's denial that it is the work of Paul~"

 

First John

First John was the only canonically accepted book of John in Eusebius' time. First John was believed to have been written as early as 90CE. The earliest known fragments that we have today are dated between the 3rd and 4th century. Concerning first John, and also second and third John, Eusebius writes, "Of John's writings, in addition to the Gospel, the first of his epistles has been accepted as authentic both in past and present, but the other two are disputed."

 

First Peter

First Peter was the only canonically accepted book of Peter in Eusebius' time. It was believed to have been written as early as 60CE and the earliest known fragment that we have today is dated to the 3rd and 4th century. We know for sure that is was used in Eusebius' time. Eusebius writes that the early Fathers quoted from, and used, first Peter as undisputed in their own writings. Namely, Polycarp bishop of Smyrna, disciple of John the evangelist, quoted from first Peter. So we know that first Peter was in circulation in Polycarp's time, which is 69-155CE. Second Peter was not regarded as canonical, though Eusebius stated that many found it was useful and some still studied it with other scriptures.

Revelation

Revelation was believed to have been written by John the apostle, while exiled on the island of Patmos. Eusebius states that the verdict on its credibility is split down the middle.  He himself says that he accepts it and believes that it was penned by John the Apostle. Papias seems to quote from it in one of his writings when he talks about the 1000 years that we are to spend on earth with Christ after His return.  Papias was born before 70CE and lived until 155CE.

 

The Early Church Fathers

Those who were disciples of Jesus' apostles, and disciples of those disciples, were known as the early church fathers. Although they did not physically see Jesus they provide a bridge from His disciples to the early church. They also provide evidence that many of the scriptures in the New Testament were written long before the earliest fragments of the books that archeologists have found, are dated.

 

Ignatius (35-107CE)

Ignatius may be the earliest known church father. He was born just a few years after Christ died in 35CE. He was one who was taught by John the Apostle. He wrote a series of letters that are still preserved today. In one of them he quotes what seems to be a passage from Luke 24:39.  In his passage Ignatius writes, "I know and believe that even after the Resurrection he was in the flesh. When he came to Peter and his companions he said to them, "Take hold, touch me and see that I am not a bodiless spirit." And they touched him at once and believed." This being said we know that Luke was in circulation during the life of Ignatius. He was known to extensively quote from the books that became the New Testament. Ignatius succeeded Peter as the bishop of Antioch. Later, in 107CE he faced martyrdom when he was fed to wild beasts.

 

Papias (Approx. 70-155CE)

Papias, bishop of Hierapolis, was born before 70CE. He was an ancient writer and a companion of Polycarp. He sought out those who were personally taught by the apostles. He did this, he said, "For I did not think that information from books would help me as much as the word of a living, surviving voice." In his writings he states that Mark, the author of the Gospel of Mark, was peter's interpreter and wrote down everything. He also states that Matthew compiled all of Christ's sayings. He spoke directly with Aristion whom was one of the original 72 Disciples of Christ. He also spoke with the presbyter John who he says was also a disciple of the Lord. This John may not have been John the Apostle but a different disciple of Jesus with the same name. Papias quotes from 1 John and 1 Peter and also from the Gospel of Hebrews.

 

Polycarp (69-155CE)

Polycarp was born in 69CE and lived until his martyrdom in 155CE when he was burned at the stake, and then finally slashed with a sword when the fire was seen not consuming him. He was appointed as bishop of Smyrna by John the apostle, whom also taught him. Polycarp helped preserve letters in his time, for edification. In his writings Polycarp even quotes from 1 Peter.

 

Quadratus (Late 1st Century-129CE)

Quadratus was born in the late first century and died in 129CE. He is known for his address, to defend the faith, to Aelius Hadrian who succeeded Trajan to the throne, sometime after 117CE. He makes a clear statement that some of those that Jesus healed lived up to his time. Quadratus writes, "Our Savior's deeds were always there to see, for they were true: those who were cured or those who rose from the dead were seen not only when they were cured or raised but were constantly there to see, not only while the Savior was living among us, but also for some time after his departure. Some of them, in fact, survived right up to our own time."

 

Justin Martyr (100-165CE)

Justin Martyr was born 100CE and died 165CE in martyrdom. He had many writings. In one, it is known that he quotes from Revelation and states that it is the work of the apostle.

 

 

Clement of Alexandria (150-215CE)

Clement was born 150CE. When writing to the church at Corinth, he quotes from the epistle of Hebrews. Eusebius uses this as his argument, that because of the early quotation, Hebrews could not have been recently written as some were disputing.  Paul even mentions Clement in Philippians 4:3



 

The Early Bible

So how did we end up with the bible that we know today, and is it credible?  Before the printing press, the books of the bible, and those not contained in our known bible today, had to be hand copied over, and over, and over again. It’s easy to make a mistake when you’re writing, and they didn't have whiteout back then. They took their time and were very careful when writing. It wasn't as if they were copying "Moby dick" or "Oliver's twist". They were handling the words of God, the life of Jesus Christ, and salvation for future generations.

 

The Earliest Sources

The Old Testament was written in Hebrew, and the New Testament was originally written in Greek. Many might think that there are not many ancient sources for scholars to refer to, to prove the New Testament credible. Archeology proves different. There are nearly 100,000 manuscripts and letters, written by Christians, that have been recovered which date back to the first few centuries. Many of these manuscripts and letters contain quotations from New Testament books.  There are 4000 known manuscripts of the bible (or parts) that date between 2nd-15th centuries. Modern Scholars possess more than 5000 manuscript copies, or portions of the New Testament, in the original Greek language. There are more than 15,000 manuscripts written in other languages from just the first few centuries. From the 1st century to the 9th century, the bible had been translated from Hebrew and Greek, to Syriac, Peshito Syriac, Old Latin, Revised Latin, Ethiopian, Gothic, Armenian, Arabic, and Slavic. There are no other historical or religious texts that has more than a few dozen early copies that have survived this long. There is not even a single complete copy of Homer earlier than 1300CE, or of Herodotus earlier than 1000CE.

The original Manuscripts have all been lost as far as we know it. Probably due to time and exposure. The original NT writings would have been written on papyrus paper, which doesn't last long unless kept in a very dry climate, like Egypt. The 1st century papyrus manuscripts would have been in scroll form about 9-10 inches wide and up to 30 feet long. In the 2nd century the manuscripts found were in codex form, meaning the pages were bound together like the books that we have today. This is one way to begin pinpointing the date of the writing. For example, if the manuscript found was in scroll form it was probably written within the 1st century, and if it was written in codex form then it was written within the 2nd and 4th century. In the 4th century they began to write on vellum, which were animal skins. Vellum was more durable and better withstood the test of time than papyrus. Until the 19th century (1800's), all known manuscripts that were accessible to us were written in, or later than, the 4th century. Scholars knew this because they were all written on vellum. It wasn't until Flinders Petrie made an important discovery in central Egypt during an excavation. There, Petrie discovered papyri manuscripts and deemed them important and valuable. Two of his pupils from Oxford, Grenfell and Hunt, began excavations in 1895 and found over 10,000 manuscripts. These included diaries, receipts, bills, letters, certificates, almanacs, and historical documents. Also among them were early Jewish and Christian writings dating between 300 BCE-300CE.

 

The Egyptian Papyri

The Egyptian Papyri were an amazing find. They included the earliest known manuscripts of Old Testament scripture until the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls. They are still today the earliest known manuscripts that we have for the New Testament. Among them were the earliest known fragments of the Gospel of John dating to the early first half of the 2nd century (125-150CE). Many other manuscripts were found. In what is called the Chester Beatty Collection, were found: Genesis, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Esther, The Gospels, Acts, Paul's Epistles, and one third of the book of Revelation. All books in the Chester Beatty Collection were written before 250CE. Also among the Papyri found were the Logia. They included parts of the books of the bible, unrecorded sayings of Jesus, an unknown Gospel that parallels the Canonical Gospels, and fragments that contain similar incidents of Jesus' life.

 

Sinaitic Manuscripts

In the 1800's a German scholar named Tischendorf discovered the Sinaitic manuscripts in the monastery of St. Catherine, located on Mt. Sinai. It is the only manuscript that contains the complete New Testament in Greek plus the epistle of Barnabas, and the shepherd of Hermas. It was written on Vellum with 15x13.5 inch dimensions. It was written in the first half of the 4th century (300-350CE). It is possible that this was one of the 50 bibles ordered to be made by Constantine for the churches of Constantinople under the direction of Eusebius.

 

The Vatican Manuscripts

The Vatican manuscript has been in the Vatican since 1481. It was written in the 4th century, and may also have been one of the 50 bibles made for the churches of Constantinople.

 

The Alexandrian Manuscripts

The Alexandrian Manuscript is the entire bible. It was written in the 5th century. It is currently in a British museum and has been since 1627. Some of the fragments are missing. It includes the Epistles of Clement, and the Psalms of Solomon.

 

The Ephraem Manuscripts

The Ephraem manuscripts were written in the 5th century. They contain about half of the New Testament.

 

The Beza Manuscripts

The Beza Manuscripts were written in the 5th century. They contain the Gospels and Acts.

 

The Washington Manuscripts

The Washington Manuscripts were written in the 4th century. They contain the Gospels. They were found in Egypt in 1906.

 

From Constantine to Theodosius

From Jesus' death until the end of the reign of Diocletian, Christians faced constant persecution. By the end of Diocletian's reign and the imperial persecutions, Christians made up about one half of the Roman Empire. After the end of Diocletian's reign in 305CE, Constantine, through a series of civil wars, became emperor in 306CE. During the civil wars, Constantine converted to Christianity after having a vision prior to a battle. He saw a cross appear in the sky above the setting sun with the words "In this sign conquer" above it. The next day he fought the battle under the banner of Christ and won. In 313CE he put into effect "the edict of toleration". This gave everyone full religious freedom. Even after declaring religious freedom for everyone, Constantine favored the Christians of the empire over others. Constantine moved the capital to Byzantium and renamed it Constantinople. He built churches there, and made Christianity the religion of his court. He also made Sunday a rest day, since Christians sought this day to come together and sing, have fellowship, and hold communion. He also ordered that no skilled labor was to be done this day. In Constantinople, Constantine ordered 50 bibles to be prepared under the direction of Eusebius on the finest vellum, by skillful artists, for the churches in Constantinople. After Constantine came Julian (361-363CE), who tried to restore Paganism. Then Jovian (363-364CE) who re-established the Christian faith. After Jovian Theodosius became emperor in 378CE, he made Christianity the state religion and forced it on the population. The church at that time stuck its nose into politics and took a turn for the worst because it lost sight of the true faith and message. Theodosius suppressed all other religions, tore down idols and forbid idol worship. Under his decree, Christians tore down pagan temples and there was much bloodshed as a result. Although many bad things happened during the turning point in Christian history, many good things happened as well. Slavery was abolished, so were gladiatorial fights, killing of unwelcome children, and crucifixion as a form of punishment was put away with as the Roman empire was Christianized.

 

The Papal Reign

After diving into politics, the church began to grow as a world power itself. Thus, the papal reign (the authority and office of the pope). With the growth of the papacy, the bible fell out of general use because of the supplanted decrees and dogmas of the councils and popes, until the protestant reformation. Eventually, the church fell into apostasy and compromised with kings and aristocracy of Europe. Laws were issued that only the clergy could possess a bible. In the dark ages even priests were not allowed to read or keep Latin bible manuscripts. After 1199 it was ordered that extensive punishment was given to those possessing or distributing the bible. Even up until 1870 it was illegal to own a bible in Italy.

 

From Greek to English

As Christianity spread around the world, the scriptures that we have today were translated to many languages within the first few centuries, from the original Greek manuscripts. In the 4th century, St. Jerome translated a revised Latin edition of the bible called the Vulgate. By the 7th century the bible was translated into Anglo Saxon. The first English bible was not the King James Bible, as many may believe. The first English bible was Wycliffe’s bible, which was translated from the vulgate in 1382. In 1525 Tyndale translated the bible from the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. Coverdale translated the bible from Dutch and Latin sources in 1535. Roger's bible was translated from Tyndale's bible in 1537. The Great Bible, put together in 1539, was a compilation of Tyndale's, Coverdale, and Roger's bible. The Bishop's bible was authorized for the Church of England in 1568. In 1611 King James ordered a revision of a version based on Tyndale's bible. The King James Bible became the common household bible for nearly 300 years. In 1901 it became necessary to revise the bible because of the change of the English language and some meanings of its words. This revised bible was known as The American Standard Revised Bible. Today we can walk into a Christian bookstore and there are dozens of English translations that are accessible to us. Many people have fought, suffered, and died for the bible that many people take for granted.   

 

Dead Sea Scrolls

The Dead Sea Scrolls were found in 1947 by a shepherd boy in Qumran, near the Dead Sea. Nearly 1000 manuscripts were found which dated back to before 68CE. Among those found were biblical and secular texts dating before the destruction of the second temple (written in Hebrew). In cave 4 alone they discovered every Old Testament book except the book of Esther. Until the discovery of the Dead Sea scrolls, it was easy to consider that the bible probably changed in wording and some of the meaning due to having to be hand copied for several thousand years. When scholars compared the Textus Receptus (the manuscripts that were used by the King James translators in 1611), with the manuscripts discovered in Qumran, they found very few spelling variations. In fact, not a single important word was altered. Most variations that were found would be similar to the difference of us using "a" instead of "an".

The Dead Sea scrolls were thought to only contain Old Testament manuscripts, but some scholars believe that they have found direct quotations to New Testament scripture, and to Jesus. One example is the crucified Messiah scroll. It’s a fragment that describes a Messiah who suffered crucifixion for the sins of humanity. Also discovered was the "son of God" scroll (4Q246) that proclaimed a future Messiah as "son of God" and "Son of most high". These two fragments cause some scholars to believe that they may have been written after Jesus' death. Another scholar, Jose' O' Callaghan studies 8 small fragments that appear to contain lines from several books of the NT. It cannot be a positive match because these fragments only contain a few lines each.

There were three main religious Jewish groups in Jesus' time. The Sadducees, the Pharisees, and the Essene. The Essene community is responsible for collecting and writing what we know as the Dead Sea scrolls. They occupied three main areas: Qumran, the Essene Quarter of Jerusalem (mount Zion), and Damascus. The Essene community would have been well aware of the Christian movement, and may have recorded some of the sayings or even have collected books or parts of those books that were in circulation before 68 CE. If some of these fragments that O'Callaghan studied are what he believes they may be, then they are the earliest known written evidence that we have of Jesus and His disciples.

 

Below is a list of the New Testament books. To the left are the proposed dates that they were written. To the right are the earliest known physical evidence that we have of that writing. Many of these are not the full books but only fragments of what time left behind.

 

Gospel of Matthew 60-85 CE \ (150–200 CE)

Gospel of Mark 60-70 CE \ (350 CE)

Gospel of Luke 60-90 CE \ (175–250 CE)

Gospel of John 80-95 CE \ (125–160 CE)

Acts 60-90 CE \ (250 CE)

Romans 57–58 CE \ (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)

Corinthians 57 CE \ (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)

Galatians 45-55 CE \ (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)

Ephesians 65 CE \ (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)

Philippians 57–62 CE \ (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)

Colossians 60 CE \ (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)

1 Thessalonians 50 CE \ (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)

2 Thessalonians 50-54 CE \ (300 CE)

Timothy 60-100 CE \ (350 CE)

Titus 60-100 CE \ (200 CE)

Philemon 56 CE \ (3rd century CE)

Hebrews 63-90 CE \ (late 2nd century or 3rd century CE)

James 50-200 CE \ (early 3rd century CE)

First Peter 60-96 CE \ (3rd/4th century CE)

Second Peter 60-130 CE \ (3rd/4th century CE)

Epistles of John 90-110 CE \ (3rd/4th century CE)

Jude 66-90 CE \ (3rd/4th century CE)

Revelation 68-100 CE \ (150–200 CE)

The New Testament
bottom of page